It's been quite some time since we've gotten all the Dallas Neighborhood Coordinators together.
With the municipal elections coming up very soon, NOW would seem to be a pretty good time to do so.
Do you agree?
If so, please share your thoughts below on when and where.
Via the Dallas Morning News:
The fight over whether Dallas should raise taxes will culminate at a City Council meeting later this month.
But the issue was probably decided well before that at a series of town hall meetings where residents have spoken out overwhelmingly in favor of sending more money to City Hall.
Every year before passing a budget, council members hold town hall meetings in recreation centers, libraries and school gymnasiums across Dallas.
This year, whether the meetings were packed with residents or sparsely attended by a handful of people, the message has largely been the same – raise taxes.
"I don't think it's fair for city employees to have their pay decrease ... and for the parks, they need to look good," Kay Taylor told City Manager Mary Suhm at a meeting held by Mayor Pro Tem Dwaine Caraway in southeastern Dallas.
"What makes a great city is parks and arts. I urge you to put the funding back, and, yes, I am willing to dig deeper," Mark Kennedy said to rousing applause at a meeting in Preston Hollow.
Please share your thoughts below.
by 2. 15% pay cut for any city employee that makes more than $75K.
3. A halt to all park construction until the city's budget can handle the maintenance costs without a tax increase.
4. Shut down "cultural centers." They only serve a fraction of the city, why should the entire city pay for them?
5. Sell the boondoggle of a hotel to pay off the debt as soon as they can get an offer high enough that the city doesn't lose money.
6. The city should start reducing debt as soon as it is able. The city's debt service is far higher than the deficit. If it hadn't incurred so much debt in the last decade, we would be in great fiscal shape.
by How about some cuts in pay across the board for city employees - and a cut in the number of employees?!!
When was the last time you went downtown to pay a ticket or register a car - only to be greeted by a never-ending line leading to an office full of bored "employees" slowly trying to look busy?!!
Here's an idea: how about streamlining and simplifying and putting our resources where they're actually needed??
For instance, how about funneling our revenue into areas that actually do some service? We're getting charged more than ever for trash pickup; only difference is: many of us now have to put our trash outside our house by the curb - instead of in the alley - which was made for trash pickup (and many times, even then, the trash is not picked up ((even though pickups have gone from twice a week to once a week!!)) ).
Basically, I'm for pay cuts in every area; for streamlining and simplifying wherever possible; and absolute
2. We have checked w/ friends in other southern cities: Atlanta, Nashville, Richmond, Houston, and NOT ONE pays the high percentage of property taxes that we do. This is ridiculous!!
It's time for everyone to tighten their belts, dig deeper and do a great job.
I just served on jury duty, where there were at least 10 officers standing around shooting the breeze. I'll bet that there are plenty of qualified people in our community that would be glad to have those jobs and do them with far better results.
Everyone needs to get a renewed work ethic and realize they are public servants. The council should pay close attention to the media that is not being covered. Civil unrest is just a bad decision away.
Raising taxes just gives permission for the City to spend. I have alread "dug deep". I am 67 and did not plan well for retirement. I don't have any extra money for Dallas.
We tax basically on the property of citizens. homes, cars, etc.
We need to intitute a
USAGE tax for schools, streets,city services such as fire department, water dept, parks and pools in playgrounds.
Every child attending school needs to pay something....either a registration fee, book fees, class fees, sport fees, etc. We, the tax payers, had small familys and paid our way, now we are inundated by illegals with enourmous familys and they pay nothing. WE should refuse admittance to our hospitals and schools unless the family is paying a monthly tax to use these services. Not a property tax, not a vehicle tax, but a Usage Tax. Since we refuse to deport illegals, at least make them pay their own way!!
We tax basically on the property of citizens. homes, cars, etc.
We need to intitute a
USAGE tax for schools, streets,city services such as fire department, water dept, parks and pools in playgrounds.
Every child attending school needs to pay something....either a registration fee, book fees, class fees, sport fees, etc. We, the tax payers, had small familys and paid our way, now we are inundated by illegals with enourmous familys and they pay nothing. WE should refuse admittance to our hospitals and schools unless the family is paying a monthly tax to use these services. Not a property tax, not a vehicle tax, but a Usage Tax. Since we refuse to deport illegals, at least make them pay their own way!!
District 10: Jerry R. Allen: Undecided, leans toward FAVORING - THIS IS NOT TRUE - HE IS LEANING AGAINST ANY TAX INCREASE! Many who attended his town hall meeting expressed a desire to raise taxes in support of libraries, rec centers, pools and the arts. I urge you to go to his city hall website and express your opinion. I had asked an e-mail correcting the error be sent, but have received no response. Pretty disappointed that when an error is made by an organization I admire and mistakes are not corrected in a timely manner.
Via the Dallas Morning News:
One of the ideas being kicked around Dallas City Hall to raise more revenue in a lean budget year is to charge residents and businesses a road-use fee.
The idea, sure to be controversial if it gains traction, was one of several presented to the City Council on Wednesday in a "brainstorming" session on the budget.
"This is a program that is implemented in some cities to assess a property a fee for the benefit they receive from the road system," said Jack Ireland, executive general manager of the city manager's office. "It's based on the trips that are generated by that property, and it helps defray that cost of the road system."
Ireland noted that Austin employs such a program, which collected $20.2 million last year from residents and $18 million from commercial properties.
The road-use-fee idea didn't prompt much discussion among council members. Only council member Ann Margolin took exception to such a fee.
"I have a really serious problem with that," she said. "Charging to use our streets, I can't even imagine the havoc that that's going to create."
Comments? Weigh in below:
I paid about 60% of my total income in total taxes last year. Medieval serfs were only taxed at 10%. Dallas needs to concentrate on public safety, the roads, and essential services only. It is top heavy in administration, and clueless on what is essential. A better way to think of it would be to ask if they had half the employees and half the dollars, what would they have to fund. Forget about more taxes; I for one am prepared to see how many of these other programs I can live without.
John King, Dallas, Texas
Dallas council members may want to look at other cities & how they operate more efficiently. Maybe you may want to think about sub contracting some of your Departments out to the Civil sector- Thy way they run a more profitable department which is a cost saver for everyone
capture the licens plate, then charge just those who use
each road; $25 for each road with no potholes or major damage, with a credit of $0.50 for using the several thousand that have damage. Oops! This will probably result in a net loss. How are we going to build another hotel or city-owened theme park if we lose money on our street usage tax? Beats me!
by To even consider this type of tax is absurd.
Every member of our city council should have rejected this idea immediately.
I intend to ask my councilperson why he didn't reject this idea right away.
Just because another city has done it doesn't make it right.
What would be next? A tax on breathing the air called quality of life air tax?
streets that we have already paid for with our tax dollars over the years. If you need more money to balance the city's budget cut your spending and do not start with our city services such as garbage,water and emergency services.
No, I am totally against it
Via MSNBC:
Half a dozen Dallas City Council members publicly endorsed Wednesday a property-tax hike to solve a $131 million budget shortfall.
Councilman Steve Salazar proposed a tax rate increase of at least 2 cents during a budget briefing.
“One for safety and one for service; we cut to the bone last year,” Salazar said.
Councilman Dwaine Caraway suggested a rate hike as much as 8 cents may be justified after several years of rejecting tax hikes.
“If we do raise taxes, I want you to know I’m going to raise them as high as we can raise them,” Caraway said. “I just want to deal with this one time.”
You can contact Mayor Leppert and your own city council member here : http://www.dallascityhall.com/government/government.html
Please share your thoughts in the comments below.
I want to express my concern about the councils consideration of any tax increases. Before any such discussion, a complete evaluation of people count and their productivity in all departments must be done. I think there are too many folks working for the city government who do little work. Please make this recommendation in the next council meeting.
Respectfully,
Bill Kean
These morons that want to raise taxes are the same morons that are building a 500 Million dollar hotel, an 80 million dollar "5 acre" park over the highway and squandered a 250 million on the trinity river and so far have only created a diarama and the money is gone.
Down goes the Dallas bond rating further.
You morons at city council should be ashamed and embarrassed followed by your resignitations.
Kevin Green
the debt problems:
Any city employee making $60K or
more gets a 10% paycut.
City employees who make less than
this get a 5% cut.
Also double the amount that city employees have to pay for health
insurance out of their own pockets.
Also city employees should have one
furlough day per quarter.
As much as I hate taxes how about
adding a half cent per $1000 for
property taxes and a quarter of
one percent sales tax.
These totals should reduce the
debt substantially.
During the "publicly-owned" Dallas convention center hotel referendum, one great slogan was "Safer Streets, Not Hotel Suites." My, how things DON'T change. Dallas taxpayers now have a half-Billion dollar revenue bond debt that has our good name (general fund) on it as collateral. And our elected reps are proposing a tax hike, cuts in police and fire pay, and they keep issuing new bond debt as if there were no bottom to the well. But, then again, how can I really blame the elected reps? Dallas voters keep on voting FOR more bond debt. And Dallas voters didn't pass the referendum that would have prevented the PUBLIC from owning the convention center hotel. Really, at the end of the day, I find it hard to place too much blame on the elected without placing due blame on the electorate. Quit voting FOR bond debt, Dallas. And quit letting these bozos at the horseshoe issue the types of bond debt that they don't even have to put before the voters.
I want to express my concern at the amount of city funds wasted on fulfilling global warming concerns. Man Made Global Warming/climate change has been proven false! Why is our tax money still funding the resulting depts. The portion below is from 3.9.
Greenhouse gas emissions are
known to contribute to climate change which the scientific community estimates will lead to rising sea levels, temperature variations, flooding, and
drought. OEQ provides the following consulting services for reducing emissions: evaluation of emission sources and control technologies; monitoring
citywide emission reductions; solicitation and management of grants and other awards; public outreach and education; and coordination with
environmental agencies and regional partners on the State Implementation Plan and other regional initiatives. OEQ also provides outreach and grant
I'm having to go again this year and fight the large increase in my properety taxes. Now their talking about increasing it again.
When does it stop?
by Next, IMHO the CAFR issue is a red herring. Cities are required to maintain fund balances for all municipal services to maintain their bond rating. Lose a good bond eating and interest on municipal obligations (CO & GO bonds) goes up increasing the debt service portion of the budget. The CAFR is an audited document that reports the status of those funds. There is no hidden pool of money that can be a silver bullet for funding cities.
Thanks for your interest!
This is a group of Dallas Citizens dedicated to keeping an eye on government at all levels.
Tuesday through Thursday nights usually work best for me, preferably somewhere along Central, but I'm flexible.
Let's get together! :-D